Monday, December 14, 2009
Different photos of the Spiral are now emerging
[UPDATE: If you were to wikipedia "Bulava Missile" before December 14, 2009, the page gave specific dimensions for each stage of the missile. The third stage was listed as 2 meters in length. That information has since been removed. Coincidence?]
A new development. The above photo is the ORIGINAL picture that every news outlet put on their websites the morning of the Norway Spiral event (December 9). The photo, below, is the picture which all major news websites are now providing (December 14). Do you see any differences? This is incredible, and frightening to think such a strategy could be effective. In a few weeks people will begin arguing WHICH of these photos they think is the doctored one - the clean, crisp one (original), or the blurry unclear one.
At this point, I'm thinking that neither of these photos were doctored. Some witnesses reported that as the spiral was forming, it was moving across the sky laterally. Perhaps these pictures were taken at different times. The people orchestrating the coverup wouldn't be stupid enough to use a doctored photo, would they?
Know what else is disturbing? Try doing an image search for "Norway Spiral" on google and see what you find. [UPDATE: google image search now allows you to view the Norway Spiral. Google blocked image searches for "Norway Spiral" from December 9 - December 16]
I guarantee you this: this coverup will involve all tabloid websites to keep the original photos of the event (the crisp, clear pictures), while the reputable news outlets will provide the blurry ones. I guarantee it. A very smart move by whomever is in charge. Tabloids are a powerful tool. When people later compare the two photo's they will conclude that the 1st image, the clear one, MUST have been doctored because the center of the spiral shifted in the two photographs. They will say: "How could the center of the spiral move - it's a missile!" It's not a missile. But, which photo will the public believe more? The blurry one from a reputable news site, or the clear/crisp one from a tabloid?
Also - if you haven't already, please take the time to read my explanation as to why the spiral CANNOT be from a missile.
This new blurry photo is featured here: